November is here and things are getting real for both the Indiana Hoosiers and Wisconsin Badgers. Indiana enters the final month of the season somehow still searching for its first Big Ten win, while Wisconsin is looking to keep the nation’s longest win streak alive.
With Indiana’s high-powered offense and Wisconsin’s stout defense, we are likely to get one of the more intriguing matchups of the weekend. But, beyond the surface this game has a lot to really be excited about.
We continue to break down the things you need to know heading in to each week, so take in the 10 things to know about the Badgers visit to Bloomington to take on the Hoosiers.
1: Wisconsin is the only unbeaten team in the Big Ten
After a crazy set of results last weekend, including Ohio State not leading Penn State until its last possession of the game, the Badgers now sit as the only undefeated team this season in the Big Ten. Of course, Ohio State is unbeaten in Big Ten play, but have a loss to Oklahoma on its record. Despite the large lead in the West division, the Badgers will not be able to clinch the West division title until next week should it win this week as two-loss teams Northwestern and Nebraska meet up. Wisconsin would clinch with wins against Indiana and Iowa regardless of what happens around them the next two weeks.
2: Indiana’s defense has just two interceptions on the season
If there has been a weak point for Badgers sophomore quarterback Alex Hornibrook this season it has been in the bad interception department. However, the Hoosiers have not had much success trying to take the ball away in the pass game coming in to this one. Let’s see if Hornibrook can avoid the bad turnover and keep off the interception list for the first time since the BYU game back in September. Since then, he has thrown seven of his eight interceptions against Big Ten play.
3: Wisconsin is averaging 3.4 sacks per game by its defense
One of the most untold stories of the 2017 season has been the Badgers ability to get after the quarterback, but do so in multiple ways. UW is averaging a full sack per game better this year than last (2.4) and ranks tied for first in the Big Ten with Michigan as well as good enough for fifth in the nation. Indiana’s pass protection hasn’t been great, allowing 20 sacks so far this season (2.5) per game to rank eighth in the B1G.
4: That is the number of fumbles recovered this season for both Indiana and Wisconsin in 2017
Turnovers are an important stat to watch on any given Saturday, and these two teams come in with very different turnover margins. Wisconsin ranks fifth in the Big Ten with a turnover margin of +2, while Indiana sits dead last with a turnover margin of -8. Hidden in those stats are two teams who have struggled to create fumbles, as both have picked up just four on the year, a number good enough for third from the bottom in the Big Ten. Wisconsin does hold a massive advantage in interceptions, with a league-leading 12 so far this year.
5: Wisconsin is one of just five unbeaten teams left in FBS football and ranks 5th nationally in third-down conversion rate
If you want to win a lot of football games, keeping the chains moving on third downs is helpful. So, it should be no surprise that the Badgers are undefeated and really good at keeping the chains moving too. Wisconsin’s third down conversion rate of 53.5 percent is fifth in the nation, and helps them to join Alabama, Georgia, Miami (FL) and UCF as the only unbeaten teams left in FBS football this season. Indiana’s defense has been really good on third downs this season, ranking third in the Big Ten and allowing teams to convert at 30.4 percent this season. Who wins this clash is likely the winner on Saturday.
6: The Badgers pass defense has allowed just six passing touchdowns in 2017
Wisconsin’s six passing touchdowns allowed is one of the best marks in the country, tying for fourth nationally. It will get severely tested on Saturday against one of the most pass-happy attacks in the Big Ten. Indiana comes in having put up 16 touchdowns on the year. However, it should be noted that IU’s offense were held out of the end zone by Michigan State and limited to one touchdown through the air against both Michigan and Penn State so far. With Peyton Ramsey making just his fourth start of the season, this could be one interesting matchup.
7: Indiana has just seven rushing touchdowns on the year
The Hoosiers of perception have come home to roost this season, as the once stout run game has taken a bit of a back seat in 2017. Transition at running back and along the offensive line have contributed to a group that hasn’t lived up to the usually lofty rushing numbers seen under Kevin Wilson. Instead, Indiana is one of five Big Ten teams who have yet to amass double-digit touchdown totals with jus seven so far. IU also sits 12th in rushing offense at 123.8 yards per game.
8: Wisconsin is just 8th in the Big Ten in punt return average
Special teams have been an interesting adventure for the Wisconsin Badgers this season, and one of the more disappointing areas has been its inability to get much of anything out of the return games. The Badgers are just eighth in the Big Ten in punt return average, gaining a whopping 6.5 yards per return. On the opposite end of the spectrum, Indiana has been deadly in the return game, ranking second in the conference with an average of 14.9 yards per punt return. That number is good for 11th in the country as well.
9: Wisconsin owns a nine-game win streak against the Indiana Hoosiers
The series between these two is the Badgers’ second-longest win streak against any Big Ten team, with the streak against Minnesota coming in ahead of this one. However, these two teams haven’t met since 2013 and Wisconsin hasn’t been to Bloomington, Ind. since 2012 either. So, what does the win streak really mean? Nothing much other than the Badgers are where they were as a program during that era and the Hoosiers are a far more competitive group than they were during this streak.
10: That is the number of touchdowns allowed by the Badgers this season
Wisconsin leads the Big Ten in touchdowns allowed, with just 10 given up so far this season. UW also ranks highly on the national level, with only Alabama’s nine touchdowns allowed ahead of the Badgers nationally. It has led the Badgers to give up just 12.9 points per game, a mark that has them fifth nationally and first in the Big Ten as well. With Indiana’s high-powered offense, it will be interesting to see which side gives in this game.
REPORT: Former Badgers QB Hornibrook transfers to FSU
It apparently didn’t take long for former Wisconsin badgers starting quarterback Alex Hornibrook to find a new home.
After spending a few days on a visit to Florida State, reports indicate he will land with the Seminoles.
Hornibrook announced his intention to graduate in May and move on from the Badgers in a statement at the end of February.
His move to FSU makes a lot of sense, as the Seminoles have a huge void at QB and hardly anyone in the position group this upcoming season.
Following the dismissal of former starting QB Deondre Francois, the Seminoles has just one scholarship quarterback on the roster.
That was redshirt sophomore James Blackman, who has started in the past but also explored his own potential transfer this offseason.
As for the Badgers, this spring will see a wide open competition for the starting quarterback job.
There is four-game starter Jack coan, along with walk-on Danny Vanden Boom. We’ll also get the first big look at redshirt freshman Chase Wolf and the highest rated quarterback to come to Wisconsin in Graham Mertz.
It appears both sides of this transfer are getting what they want and that’s the best outcome you could hope for.
Hornibrook won’t have to compete with four other quarterbacks and the Badgers can get a better read on their realistic options for 2019 and beyond this spring.
2019 NFL Combine results for Badgers players
The next step up for many former Wisconsin Badgers is the NFL. For eight players that step included an invite to the annual player combine, where teams test and poke and prod players for an entire weekend.
So, how did the Badgers fare? Let’s take a look at results and talk coming out of the combine.
40-yard dash: 4.81 seconds
Bench Press: 20 reps
Vertical Jump: 33.5″
Broad Jump: 119.0″
What was said about Dixon (from Lance Zierlein): Although he was an interchangeable, versatile safety in college, Dixon may need a more static position in the pros to minimize his exposure. He can handle man cover duties, but his instincts and anticipation aren’t good enough to make up for his lack of closing burst and his lack of height limits his ability to challenge deep jump balls. He does have some talent, however, and could compete for a backup role with an eye on dime linebacker or a Cover-2, Cover-4 safety.
Prospect Grade: 5.26 (NFL Backup or Special Teams Potential)
40-yard dash: 5.24 seconds
Bench Press: 20 reps
What was said about Benzschawel: Tall, pass-blocking specialist who will need to prove he can be serviceable against NFL power in the run game to become a future starter. Benzschawel plays with good technique and an understanding of blocking concepts in the run game, but might lack the play strength at point of attack NFL teams look for. However, his allure to GMs and offensive coaches could be his ability to match up against athletic, sub-package rushers in today’s quickness-oriented rush approaches.
Prospect Grade: 5.55 (Chance to Become NFL Starter)
40-yard dash: 5.23 seconds
Bench Press: 21 reps
Vertical Jump: 28″
Broad Jump: 105.0″
3-cone drill: 7.88 seconds
20-yard shuttle: 4.81 seconds
What was said: Durable, capable guard/center prospect who knows how to play the game but might lack the athletic elements needed to become a full-time starter on the next level. Dieter’s experience in a variety of pro-style rushing schemes and his overall technique work are in his favor while his experience across the line offer flexibility that could lock him into an NFL roster as an early backup with the potential to step in and start if needed.
Prospect Grade: 5.60 (Chance to Become NFL Starter)
40-yard dash: 5.28 seconds
Bench Press: —
Vertical Jump: 25.5″
Broad Jump: 99.0″
3-cone drill: 7.69 seconds
20-yard shuttle: 4.77 seconds
What was said: Quarterback-turned-tight-end-turned-right-tackle who has maintained his light feet but is missing functional strength and body control to hold his ground against NFL power. Edwards isn’t the technician we’ve come to expect from the Wisconsin program and he’ll need additional technique work to help make up for some of his physical deficiencies. He’s still a pup as an offensive lineman and he should improve with more experience and weight room work, but it’s tough to project him behind average backup to low-end starter at this point.
Prospect Grade: 5.44 (NFL Backup or Special Teams Potential)
40-yard dash: 4.66 seconds
Bench Press: —
Vertical Jump: 34.5″
Broad Jump: 118.0″
3-cone drill: 7.09 seconds
20-yard shuttle: 4.31 seconds
What was said: Connelly fits the Wisconsin mold of tough, productive linebackers who end up lacking either size or speed as NFL projections. He’s not big enough to play SAM and he’s not fast enough to play WILL so he’ll end up as a slightly smaller/slower 3-4 or 4-3 inside backer. He does a decent job of playing around his deficiencies and finding ways to make impact tackles and he’s fairly instinctive is zone coverage. He has the demeanor and play traits to become a solid special teamer with average backup potential.
Prospect Grade: 5.36 (NFL Backup or Special Teams Potential)
40-yard dash: —
Bench Press: 16
Vertical Jump: —
Broad Jump: —
3-cone drill: —
20-yard shuttle: —
What was said: Stout four-year starter who shows up and does his job each week as a banger in the box with surprising ball skills to flip the field. He improved each season and his off-season weight loss is indicative of how seriously he takes the game. He lacks desired chase speed and might be maxed out as a player, but he doesn’t make many dire mistakes that hurt his team. Edwards is a backup inside linebacker for a 3-4 or 4-3 defense with the ability to step up and handle starter’s duties if needed.
Prospect Grade: 5.47 (NFL Backup or Special Teams Potential)
Andrew Van Ginkel
Bench Press: 17
Vertical Jump: 38″
Broad Jump: 123.0″
3-cone drill: 6.89 seconds
20-yard shuttle: 4.14 seconds
What was said: Unimposing 3-4 outside linebacker with decent athletic ability but a concerning lack of aggression as a run blocker and consistency as a pass-rusher. Van Ginkel has the motor to tally stats with effort and secondary rush, but he needs a better rush plan and more proactive hands to set him up for success in attacking the quarterback. He will need a lot more strength and toughness to hold up as a run defender, but his length and production on special teams could give him a shot at the back end of the roster or on a practice squad.
Prospect Grade: 5.0 (50-50 chance to make an NFL roster)
Hornibrook’s gone, but questions remain the same for Badgers QB’s
If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it, right?
It’s hard to argue that the formula that the Wisconsin Badgers have used for nearly 30 years has been highly successful. Play great defense, pound your opponent in to submission and catch them with a deep ball or two along the way.
UW has gone to six Rose Bowls, participated in two College Football Playoff bowl games and won six Big Ten titles in those nearly 30 years and with said formula.
But, that last part has been missing from the Badgers offense for awhile now…you know, since Russell Wilson stopped dazzling us with his rocket arm and escapability back in 2011.
From Joel Stave to Alex Hornibrook and other quarterbacks in between, the UW offense has struggled to find that guy who makes opponents respect his arm enough to stop stuffing the line of scrimmage.
With the news on Wednesday that Hornibrook would be transferring from the program for his final season, the competition is now wide open for the next Badgers starting quarterback.
The bar for success is admittedly low, after all, the Badgers finished 102nd in the country last season with 14 interceptions and 119th in passing offense (157.7 passing yards per game). Nearly anything would be better than what the quarterbacks of 2018 produced.
Losing Hornibrook does mean losing an experienced player, but does it matter much when that player had 33 interceptions in as many games played?
Sure, he was 26-6 as a starter over three years. But, was that because of or in spite of him? I’d argue having one of the best defenses and running back groups in the country has been the driver of that success, not Hornibrook.
Which brings me to the question at hand — is there a quarterback on the Badgers roster that can be someone other teams have to respect? Is there another player ala Russell Wilson, who is capable of taking this offense from ground and pound to three dimensional?
Let’s start with a look at the only quarterback on the roster to play a college game — Jack Coan.
Last season we got the biggest glimpse of Coan to date and what was shown wasn’t all that promising. He played in five games, starting four and completed 60.2 percent of his passes for 515 yards and 5 touchdowns to 3 interceptions.
There was plenty left to be desired, but I also wonder if it was because of too much protection from the coaching staff or just not being ready for the situation. Often the game plan called for Coan to dink and dunk the ball and he was never really given the opportunity to unleash the deep ball.
It seemed like the coaching staff was trying hard to get away with not having to put the game on the sophomore quarterback.
Coan now has those four starts under his belt and with Honribrook out of the way has the experience advantage over everyone else. But, is experience enough?
We’re about to find out, because the Badgers have one of the top quarterbacks in the 2019 class in the fold this spring in Graham Mertz.
Last we saw him, he was setting records at The All-American Bowl game en route to MVP honors. He was flinging the ball deep and accurately, something Badgers fans haven’t seen from a quarterback since Wilson came in to save this team in 2011.
But, there is bound to be a learning curve as Mertz transitions away from spread-based concepts to more under center work. How that transition goes this spring and how quickly he understands and executes the playbook will be telling.
The good news is that we’ve seen Mertz challenged against the best competition in the country at the quarterback position and he’s lived up to billing on every occasion. If ever there was a QB up to the challenge of playing early in a Badgers uniform, it is Mertz.
But, that doesn’t mean he has to be “the guy” either. There are other options to consider already on the Badgers roster.
Both Danny Vanden Boom and Chase Wolf flashed moments of potential all last offseason. In fact, Vanden Boom outplayed Coan throughout most of last spring before tailing off a bit in the competition in the fall.
Could Vande Boom pick it back up this spring and become a viable option? The former Kimberly star and walk-on at UW certainly has played at a level that makes giving him a legitimate chance this spring worthwhile.
On the other hand, Wolf was one of five quarterbacks in the mix last offseason and his reps have been limited. He’ll likely see many more this spring and it’s a chance to shine.
There’s no doubt he’s the dark horse in the race to replace Hornibrook, but with a full year of studying and learning the Badgers offense you never know what will happen when he gets his chance this spring.
All of this leads me to this conclusion — no one, not even the coaching staff has a real answer as to whom will lead the Badgers offense in 2019. If anyone tells you they do, it’s just an uneducated guess at best.
But, what I do know is that spring camp provides the coaches and players the best opportunity to fully understand what the quarterbacks could be capable of in 2019.
There’s little need to get work in in the run game save for the offensive line, but what is going to be important is pressure-testing the quarterbacks. Doing so in a controlled environment like spring ball is a great way to do so.
If the Badgers want to transform from a good team to a great one, they’ll need to find that transformational quarterback as soon as possible. It could also be that the coaching staff needs to find ways to transform the Badgers offense in small ways to take advantage of the quarterback’s strengths.
Hopefully there’s a positive answer that emerges following spring ball.
Hornibrook leaves Badgers, enters name in transfer portal
The Wisconsin Badgers will have a new starting quarterback in 2019, as senior quarterback Alex Hornibrook announced his departure from the program.
“Alex informed us of his decision to leave the team earlier today,” head coach Paul Chryst said in a statement. “He contributed to a lot of our recent success and we want to thank him for all he did for our program. We wish him the best of luck.”
Not only is Hornibrook not playing for the Badgers next season, he has also entered his name in to the transfer portal and will look to play elsewhere next year.
Hornibrook went 26-6 in three seasons as a starting quarterback for the Badgers, including a 20-4 record in Big Ten games. His .813 winning percentage is the best of any quarterback in program history.
He ranks in a tie for third all-time at Wisconsin in touchdown passes (47), fourth in completion percentage (60.5%) and fifth in passing yards (5,438).
That would normally suggest this loss is a big blow. But, there have always been serious questions as to just how much he was contributing to the cause of that 22-6 record.
Additionally, he benefited from longevity quite a bit. Hornibrook started from his redshirt freshman season played in the majority of three seasons, which hasn’t been the normal rate for quarterbacks in college football or at Wisconsin specifically.
There are also the mounds of interceptions to consider as well, as Hornibrook threw 33 interceptions to just 47 touchdowns in his first three years. He also contributed 11 interceptions towards last season’s 14 total as team. That ranked 102nd in the country.
The Badgers will start their search for a new starting quarterback on March 26.
Badgers football3 months ago
Wisconsin Badgers vs. Miami Hurricanes: 5 Things to know
Badgers Basketball2 months ago
Reuvers career night lifts Badgers past Illini
Badgers Basketball1 month ago
Matthews powers Michigan past Badgers
Badgers Basketball2 months ago
Beyond the Boxscore: Defense helps Badgers upset Michigan